The argument between Old Pension Scheme (OPS) and New Pension Scheme (NPS) is crucial to new job seekers as well as to those who are planning retirement. Making a decision concerning the two schemes requires an understanding of their subtle differences due to the fact that they have different characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. The goal of this article is to enable readers to understand the differences and select between OPS and NPS depending on the kind of retirement plan or remuneration they want, by providing a comprehensive study of each scheme with its major features. So let’s start.
An Overview
Pension Programme in India was first introduced during the 1950s for purposes of acting as post-retirement income. 50% of their final basic salary plus Dearness Allowance were assured to government employees under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS). Also, half yearly revision of DA was also included. However, one has to serve for not less than ten years in order to qualify into it.
On the other hand, New Pension Scheme (NPS) was opened up both for private sector and public sector employees in 2004 by National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. Employees pay 10% of their salary while employers contribute 14%. This scheme was envisaged to give access to market-based incentives on their contribution. Also, at maturity, the 60% of the accumulated benefits are tax exempted, while the rest 40% could be used for buying annuities with a 100% tax cover.
Key Features
OPS is a pension scheme that guarantees retirees from government employment, fixed monthly pay-outs which can vary due to years of service offered, average salary during employment or retirement age. It is structured under assured benefit provisions to ensure certainty of income for pensioners. Moreover, a retiree may choose to take part of his/her pension as lump sum payment upon retirement.
NPS is available for both public and private sector employees and it offers market linked investment options across different asset classes as well as flexible-pension solutions. NPS operates on the basis of defined contributions whereby individuals make savings towards their pensions funds that are later invested in returns generating projects. This system is divided into two tiers: Tier I – mandatory with tax breaks and Tier II – is voluntary with flexibilities of withdrawal.
Pros and Cons: A Comprehensive Comparison of OPS and NPS
| Title | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Old Pension Scheme | Guaranteed Pension with Financial Security | Lack of Flexibility |
| Employer Contribution | Limited Portability | |
| New Pension scheme | Investment Flexibility | Depends on Market Risks |
| Potential for Higher Returns | Investment Decisions oriented | |
| Easy Portability |
Old Pension Scheme
Merits:
• Financial Security: Old pension scheme provides Government employees with an assured amount of pension irrespective of the changes realized in the market, which are guaranteed during their retirement.
• Employer’s contribution: This scheme is based completely on employer contribution. Employers who make pension contributions ensure that there is adequate funds for pension benefits.
Demerits:
• Less flexible than NPS when it comes to investment options and withdrawal plans.
• Restricted job shifting as OPS benefits are usually connected to specific institutions or organizations.
New Pension Scheme
Merits
• Variety of investment options: NPS allowing for individual preferences and financial objectives has no restrictions on the kind of investment, asset allocation or withdrawal strategies.
• Possibility for higher returns: NPS is a market linked scheme with chances of yielding higher returns compared to fixed pension plans like OPS.
• Ease in Portability: The benefits under NPS are transferable across employers which makes it flexible and less cumbersome when employees change jobs.
Demerits
• Subject to Market Risks: The return on NPS investments depends on the performance of the market and is subject to market risks.
• Oriented towards Investment Decisions: Well-informed investment decisions such as selection of a fund and asset allocation require financial education and knowledge about market dynamics.
In conclusion, personal preference, risk tolerance, financial objectives and need for flexibility are some factors that may affect whether one chooses OPS or NPS. OPS offers stability by way of guaranteed income in old age but lacks flexibility and portability when it comes to investment. On the other hand, investing in NPS requires constant monitoring due to its ever-changing nature that results from market risks. In contrast, it also allows for better returns through mobility and enhanced flexibility. However, the Union Government’s pension reforms has led to the elimination of India’s Old Pension Scheme (OPS). But to choose which pension plan best fits their retirement planning goals, people should evaluate their priorities and speak with financial consultants.
Also read
A Comparison of Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy
How Does Printing Excess Money Cause Inflation?
Get Free Online Test Series, GK updates in form of Beepedia, BeeBooster, as well as latest updates for Bank PO, Bank Clerk, SSC, RBI, NABARD and Other Government Jobs.
